Proving Accuracy, Adversarial Resilience, and Cybersecurity under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 15
Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 legally requires high-risk systems to prove accuracy, fault tolerance, and protection against prompt manipulation and data poisoning. The platform executes those exact resilience tests without harming live data and produces the technical documentation required by Annex IV.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the EU AI Act) imposes legally binding technical obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk artificial intelligence systems and general-purpose models with systemic risk. Specifically, Article 15 mandates verifiable levels of accuracy (paragraph 1), technical redundancy and fail-safe plans (paragraph 4), and resilience against unauthorized third-party manipulation, including data poisoning, model poisoning, and adversarial inputs (paragraph 5).
Security Officer (Plain Meaning): Halts "Permit adversarial input manipulation, data poisoning, or unauthorized tool execution on high-risk AI system" before socket (0 live DB damage, signed GOST receipt)
IT Auditor & SecOps (Evidence): Scope EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Art. 15 | Wire Rule SEC-ZD-CMP-07 | Formal Witness f193c508b62d49a7
Technocrat, CTO & VC (Moat): Z3 Invariant (assert (and (resilient_to_data_poisoning system) (resilie... | FP = 0.0% | Contract IMMUNE-CMP-F193C508 (mcp-sentinel 1.1.2)1. Regulatory Enforcement and Verification Schematic for CMP-EUA-07
Deterministic compliance verification flow for CMP-EUA-07 (EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Art. 15, High-Risk AI Accuracy, Resilience & Cybersecurity): wire rule SEC-ZD-CMP-07 intercepts destructive mutations prior to socket transmission, witness f193c508b62d49a7 seals the empirical proof, and compiler emits gateway contract IMMUNE-CMP-F193C508 for mcp-sentinel.
2. Regulatory Mandate, Safe Execution, and Solver Invariant for CMP-EUA-07
Demonstrating compliance with Article 15(5) requires more than policy declarations: conformity assessment bodies demand empirical proof that adversarial inputs cannot force the system to execute unauthorized actions. Under rule SEC-ZD-CMP-07, the verifier subjects agentic and application interface routes to structured indirect injection, vector poisoning, and tool-schema tampering probes within the zero-damage sandbox.
Across the benchmark suite, the verifier measures exact accuracy and false-positive rates on paired control routes, sealing formal witness f193c508b62d49a7. This empirical record directly fulfills the technical documentation requirements of Annex IV (section 2(g) on validation and testing procedures) and the logging obligations of Article 12.
Section Identifier: CMP-EUA-07 (eu_ai_act_article_15)
Standard & Profile: EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Art. 15 | High-Risk AI Accuracy, Resilience & Cybersecurity
Verification Mode: Deterministic Verification (AUTO_SCAN)
Candidate Probe: POST /api/v1/compliance/eu-ai-act {"regulation":"EU_2024_1689","article":15,"paragraphs":["15.1_accuracy","15.4_resilience","15.5_cybersecurity"]}
Prevented Harm: Permit adversarial input manipulation, data poisoning, or unauthorized tool execution on high-risk AI system
Z3 Solver Invariant: (assert (and (resilient_to_data_poisoning system) (resilient_to_model_evasion system) (= (unauthorized_action_rate system) 0.0)))
Wire Verification Rule: SEC-ZD-CMP-07
Formal Witness Hash: f193c508b62d49a7
Compiled Sentinel Rule: IMMUNE-CMP-F193C508 (mcp-sentinel 1.1.2)3. Cryptographic Acceptance Evidence for IMMUNE-CMP-F193C508 and Streebog-256 Receipt
From witness f193c508b62d49a7, the immune compiler outputs contract IMMUNE-CMP-F193C508 for border enforcement. Deploying this contract inside mcp-sentinel provides the deterministic fail-safe barrier required by Article 15(4).
4. Auditor and Inspector Reference Notes for CMP-EUA-07
Fulfilling Annex IV section 2(g) testing documentation with machine-readable passports
The structured audit passport exports the exact record date, dataset size, confusion matrix, and cryptographic digests required for conformity assessment files.
Satisfying Article 15(4) fail-safe requirements on autonomous tool calls
Whenever an input violates a formal constraint, the gateway deterministically halts execution and returns a minimal unsatisfiable core without corrupting downstream state.