Deterministic Vulnerability Testing for State Systems and Significant Objects under Orders 117 and 239
State information systems and significant infrastructure objects require regular vulnerability testing without any risk of service disruption. The platform satisfies both requirements by blocking destructive commands inside the wire filter, confirming flaws against paired decoys, and sealing every test step in a Streebog-256 ledger.
Operators of state information systems and significant objects of critical information infrastructure under Federal Law No. 187-FZ dated July 26, 2017 must conduct periodic vulnerability assessments and penetration tests. Order No. 117 of the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control of Russia dated April 11, 2025 (clauses 60 and 61, entering into force on March 1, 2026) and Order No. 239 dated December 25, 2017 require documented verification of application interfaces and autonomous components without degrading operational availability.
Security Officer (Plain Meaning): Halts "Execute unverified destructive scan against state information system or significant infrastructure node" before socket (0 live DB damage, signed GOST receipt)
IT Auditor & SecOps (Evidence): Scope FSTEC Order 117 / Order 239 / 187-FZ | Wire Rule SEC-ZD-CMP-01 | Formal Witness 4180a92cb53e7104
Technocrat, CTO & VC (Moat): Z3 Invariant (assert (and (= (destructive_mutations_blocked stand_run) ... | FP = 0.0% | Contract IMMUNE-CMP-4180A92C (mcp-sentinel 1.1.2)1. Regulatory Enforcement and Verification Schematic for CMP-FST-01
Deterministic compliance verification flow for CMP-FST-01 (FSTEC Order 117 / Order 239 / 187-FZ, GOST R 56939-2024 Clauses 5.6-6.4): wire rule SEC-ZD-CMP-01 intercepts destructive mutations prior to socket transmission, witness 4180a92cb53e7104 seals the empirical proof, and compiler emits gateway contract IMMUNE-CMP-4180A92C for mcp-sentinel.
2. Regulatory Mandate, Safe Execution, and Solver Invariant for CMP-FST-01
Running conventional blind scanners against regulated state portals creates an unacceptable hazard of table corruption, worker exhaustion, or accidental cross-boundary redirects. Under rule SEC-ZD-CMP-01, the platform resolves this dilemma by passing every probe through an in-path software filter before socket transmission. All 26 destructive mutation patterns are intercepted inside the verifier process.
To meet the secure software development requirements of GOST R 56939-2024 (clauses 5.6 through 6.4), every test class is evaluated against a paired hardened decoy route on the N = 28 benchmark stand. The resulting confusion matrix records 14 true positives and zero false positives, producing formal witness 4180a92cb53e7104.
Section Identifier: CMP-FST-01 (fstec_117_239_kii_gis)
Standard & Profile: FSTEC Order 117 / Order 239 / 187-FZ | GOST R 56939-2024 Clauses 5.6-6.4
Verification Mode: Deterministic Verification (AUTO_SCAN)
Candidate Probe: POST /api/v1/compliance/fstec-audit {"profile":"FSTEC_117_239","target_scope":"localhost:8888","check_clauses":["117.p60","117.p61","239.ANV"]}
Prevented Harm: Execute unverified destructive scan against state information system or significant infrastructure node
Z3 Solver Invariant: (assert (and (= (destructive_mutations_blocked stand_run) 26) (= (false_positives stand_run) 0) (= (streebog_chain_valid ledger) true)))
Wire Verification Rule: SEC-ZD-CMP-01
Formal Witness Hash: 4180a92cb53e7104
Compiled Sentinel Rule: IMMUNE-CMP-4180A92C (mcp-sentinel 1.1.2)3. Cryptographic Acceptance Evidence for IMMUNE-CMP-4180A92C and Streebog-256 Receipt
From witness 4180a92cb53e7104, the compiler emits gateway rule IMMUNE-CMP-4180A92C for the mcp-sentinel 1.1.2 gateway. Every probe and compiled rule is recorded in the synchronous GOST R 34.11-2012 hash chain so an inspection commission can replay the factory test protocol offline.
4. Auditor and Inspector Reference Notes for CMP-FST-01
Distinction between the automated factory test passport and a state certificate
The generated file INDRA_AUDIT_PASSPORT.md is an objective developer factory test protocol built from live testbed measurements and provides verified engineering evidence for formal certification procedures.
Satisfying vulnerability analysis requirements without service downtime
Because resource-intensive probes are isolated in laboratory mode and destructive queries are blocked before the socket, active verification runs safely without disrupting production operations.